Sunday, December 04, 2005

Airi Kinoshita Rest in Peace

Last week a little girl, aged 7, called Airi, was found strangled and dumped in a cardboard box in Hiroshima city, less than 10Km from where I used to live. Everyone who heard the news, whether living in Hiroshima or elsewhere, was left incredulous. None of us want to believe that murder happens on our doorstep at all, and when it's a 7 year old on her way home from school, reactions are emotional and extreme. I know how I feel: when I type her name, it's Mairi without the M. God alone knows how her family will cope. If you read Japanese, look at her father's statement to the press here, before the killer's identity was even suspected. It had me in tears imagining a precious life so unfairly snuffed out. Nothing anyone can say, far less me, can lessen their horror in any way.
By far my most prominent reaction to this news is utter horror that this kind of thing happens anywhere. I'm totally unreligious, but Airi -chan, when I think of you, I hope there is something like heaven and that you're there.

Now why am I writing this here?

The man who did this has been caught and has admitted the crime. It has caused a certain amount of "discussion" in the foreign community here, because the monster happens to be Peruvian. A couple of my good friends have posted on their blogs on the subject too. JJ, tackling it in a practical way, addresses the issue that affects us most: what we can do to protect our own kids, here at Hiroshima Oyako. She asked me to comment, but I had to take a while to gather my thoughts.
I obviously agree with your sentiments, JJ: we have to take a collective responsibity as adults for our own children as well as other children we encounter who might be in danger. This is a hard one though. One thing you learn when bringing up a child is that common sense is anything but common. What to some is an utter no-no, is to others the natural way of doing things, and because someone does things differently from you doesn't necessarily mean that they haven't thought about it much. Where to draw the line with approaching strange situations, however well intentioned, is such a hard call. (Obviously the airgun one is a no-brainer though.) I have attracted dirty and strange looks for commenting on the behaviour of and towards children not my own outside too.
" Scary" is also in the eye of the beholder. On another tack, I was thinking, trying to empathise with the kids; particularly, but not exclusively, our "international" kids. You always wonder how these things can happen in broad daylight. We tell them not to speak to strangers, but at the same time encourage them to be polite, and answer people's greetings, however wary they are. In our "foreign" cases, we tell them not to speak or go with strangers, but them drag them half way round the world and encourage them to be nice to our relatives and old friends, most of whom, to them, are practically strangers. Kids, however cute, are seldom stupid about these things, and there must come a scary point , possibly even about Airi's age, when these kind of contradictory statements by adults get confusing. From an adult perspective the differences are clear, but it's got to be confusing for kids.
So is it pointless to try and teach them, thereby scaring them more sometimes ( like in Felix's case) ? Of course not, confused and a little bit scared, but healthily suspicious and prepared, is better than attacked or dead.
In fact I think children's literature and entertainment has become too polarised these days. The bad guys never meet grisly ends like in the old days, when good and evil were clear. We are all taught to embrace each other's differences and think of the mitigating reasons why illdoers felt the need to commit the crimes. The villains invariably see the error of their ways and become friends with everyone in the end. This "no-one is really just "bad" " attitude concerns me. Especially here in Japan, I feel that young kids are cushioned in a superficially cute world, which belies the reality which eventually hits them in the face with no warning. The other extreme is the meaningless kick and punch" Magi Ranger" type violence where kids are given no clear message. The good guys kick and punch with the rest of them, but they are "cooler" so that's OK. ???? I don't think what happens on TV is necessarily the ultimate influencing factor in our children's mindsets either, but it's another thing to throw into the mix.
Whether or not this murder, or the next incident, has us ferrying our children to and from school personally indefintely , and trying to protect their every moment; or whether we settle again into a false sense of security when the news has been forgotten by everyone but Airi's family; the bottom line that we must face is that there are insane bastards out there whose behaviour can never be predicted, and the only way to cope with that is to assume" it won't happen to me or mine". What bothers me here, is that it is (logically only) implicit in our cathartic discussion, that in some way Airi-chan herself, or her parents, or her teachers, or her friends, or anyone who cared for her, was somehow at fault in this for not being careful or suspicious enough. Which is an absolutely disgusting thing to suggest. The only one at fault was the bastard who did it. I think that's why it took me so long to comment.
Don't misunderstand JJ, I'm not critising your thoughts, I know that's not your intention. What you say is right and almost goes without saying. My hesitation came from the fact that my next reaction after horror and sympathy for the girl and her family, was dismay that the monster who did this turned out to be non-Japanese; rather than worrying about how to protect Mairi more. I think we all strive as parents to do that anyway. And this news will only serve to sharpen our instincts.

SO, now on to the gaijin issue. Before you get your knickers in a twist, Maethelwine, if you've got this far, I agree with the essence of what you say. ( What Maethelwine says is
here, btw) . The main point here is that nationality aside, a tragedy and unspeakable injustice has occurred.
However, I disagree if you believe that race is not an issue. It would be an issue in any country, just as , as you say, the race of the perpetrator of such a crime would be quoted on the first line of the top page of every article about a similar case anywhere. But just because Japan's racism is not unique does not mean it shouldn't be up for discussion. The "Shut up and go home, if you don't like it" attitude has always annoyed me. Injustice should always be up for constructive discussion.
The examples you cite are indeed specific cases of idiots or at best people who have let passion cloud their expression, shall we say. Now that we know he did it, with evidence, the discussion is indeed moot. Boiling him in oil is too good for him. And yes, job swiftly well done to the police.
But I heard the news when they first arrested him, and, not much evidence was explained. And full confessions are famously and suspiciously frequent here. The "baying" of the gaijin, may not necessarily be based on ignorance of the present case, but skepticism based on prior experience. . Perhaps you have been lucky, and have only experienced mild irritation from your kokusai experiences. Perhaps they were "baying" out of concern for a (at the time) possibly innocent man . If he had been, and no-one spoke up for him that would have been unforgivable too wouldn't it? My past experience gives me the impression, that there is more "tarring with the same brush" in Japan than in my experience of my own culture, and that there are consequences for the other members of the same group (any group, but also foreigners) when one asshole commits a sin. Personal responsiblity is not the biggest thing here.
Therefore a racially prejudiced rush to arrest was not completely outwith the realms of possibility. I preferred to wait for the evidence to come out before shouting about it, but can't say it didn't cross my mind at the presentation of the news. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Having said that, I didn't read all of whatever caused you to be upset either. Anyway, this digression is all just a reaction to what you wrote. The point?
My dismay at the news of his gaijinness was not based on any presumption of innocence on Yagi's part. Rather, knowing the Japanese ( yes, yes, not ALL Japanese!) tendency to label and lump members of groups together, I worry for the other hard-working innocent Peruvians, Brasilians, Filipinos and others who will no doubt feel the repercussions of this monster's handiwork. The deepened sense of mistrust that will (somewhat understandably even) no doubt be born from this, will make their lives less comfortable at best, and at worst result in failure to procure work , business ties being starined, etc etc. I won't go so far as to say that it's institutionalised, but I have personally witnessed the difference in treatment by Japanese, even at the immigration offices, and in two prefectures, one very rural, one not so rural, dished out to white North American and European gaijin on the one hand, and South American, Chinese, Korean and Filipino ones on the other.This ranges from just basic lack of manners, to treating them with suspicion and assuming stupidity, so who knows what concrete forms the discrimination may also take. I was surprised to witness this, as I have, believe it or not always liked to assume the best first, but 15 years here have given me ample opportunity to see that it is not all just "whining" ( however abundant that commodity may also be). They don't get the same treatment as we do, and sometimes even we have legitimate moans too.
I have been lucky to meet wonderful Japanese friends and people ( or I would have shut up and gone home a long time ago), both in Miyazaki and here, and Maethelwine, we have both been lucky to live in the relatively internationally tolerant and friendly city of Hiroshima. I hope that tolerance bears up in the light of recent events.
I agree that everything should be judged on its merits, and race shouldn't be a factor here. But that doesn't mean it won't be. And that makes me sad.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jax-
I am so glad you wrote all of that down, sad to admit that I think I would have interrupted you way too soon had that been a conversation in person or on the phone, I am a much better listener when reading I find.
I have also been so worried about my friends and people I know are hurting the most from this who are being tainted by the same brush of association as the murderer because they are Brazilian or from Peru, I hope people here can rise above that, but I am rather skeptical about it. I fear a backlash against businesses run by Peruvians and south americans as well as the reaction to them personally and on the street.
Although we are the more accepted versions I have had children cry when they saw me sit near them on the train saying "gaijin kowai" and their mothers say "kowai ne". I have heard many students tell me they would never have children with a foreigner because the child's blood would not be "pure" and I know you have had your fair share of experiences.
It is a horrendous issue on so many levels and I am relieved that there seems to be such strong evidence against him and it seems clear cut too.
I am also aware that being "aware" of what is going on as I have written does carry a sense of overstepping the boundaries, but that has to be everyone's own call, I hope I don't offend others by being protective of their kids when I insist that they strap them into their carseats and I hope that friends or strangers give me a little reminder when I allow F to run amok in dangerous places- I promise to try not to take offense and keep in mind that they are keeping the child's best interests in mind, but you know as well as I that sometimes that logic doesn't follow (I refused to wear a pregnancy "obi" belt and other gems of advice I choose to ignore) and there are certain controversial judgement calls about our own kids that we have to make for ourselves (antibiotics, medicating, discipline, giving treats- these issues are all rather sticky).
But I have great respect for you as a wonderful parent, we are all in it together -mere muddles struggling along, and although I may challenge a decision another parent might make, or make a suggestion, but I don't mean any offense or insult- and I just hope people can see that for what it is when it happens.

4/12/05 23:35  
Blogger Maethelwine said...

First, you need to allow people access to your Blogger profile. I didn't even know you kept this blog until you posted the url in that last comment. Which probably means you've only told me about it three or four times. Suddenly I have some nagging recollection of precisely such a mention. Anyway...senility setting a bit early, perhaps.

Nowhere in my posting did I berate anyone for occasional whining. If fact the word doesn't appear once. And I have always acknowledged that there is ample racism in this country. I emphatically do not belong to the "keep a feckin' smile on your face or get out" camp.

But I really felt that in this case the reaction served to draw focus away from a dead little girl. Selfish and grotesque, I thought. As for the police not disclosing evidentiary details on television, why the hell would they? They shouldn't have thrown his picture up quite so early, perhaps, but the press here is all tabloid, from top to bottom, and I haven't found much reason to expect discretion from them. I thought the fact that the press caught wind of this so early indicated that the police must be moving in a straight line for this guy, based on solid evidence. And the sensationalism with which it was treated primarily highlights how unusual this situation is.

Even now, there are people who are talking about a big frame-up. Are you following the news on this guy? He's filth, but there are people all over the bandwidth who refuse to admit that "one of us" (talk about tarring with the same brush, what the hell do I have in common with this clown?) could have done it. I've even seen boy-genius suggestions that one of the Japanese neighbors offed little Airi and stuffed her in Yagi's discarded box to frame him because everyone was so tired of living near him. Great stuff.

Many of the comments I'm seeing are from hysterical young white men with too much time on their hands, peering between the slats of their blinds and listening for the approaching sound of stormtrooper's boots. You are quite right that we have very little idea of, and do not share, whatever treatment may or may not be dealt out to poorer, browner foreigners. And it troubles me to see white foreigners, who give no thought to and take no action on behalf of these populations, cry common cause when one of them gets handled a bit carelessly in the wake of a child killing that, in fact, he clearly committed. And although reverse racism is always a slightly silly argument to deploy, where are all the shouted questions about faked DNA evidence and pictures in the news when it's a Japanese killer?

Last, although I've been guilty of doing so, I'm not generally comfortable making comparisons between this culture on my own concerning issues such as racism. But I think you may have been in Japan so long that you've forgotten how bad things can actually be at home. Japanese are more likely to tar with the same brush? In my country, for all too many people, Japanese are just slants or chinks, and any notion of distinguishing between Asian cultures would be laughed down. And there have been times when looking 'Jappish' could get you beaten half to death, after another GM factory closes down somewhere. We have violent, racially motivated hate crimes going on all the time. I'm fairly comfortable making the same claim for your country. One of the reasons Lorna, who you may not have met, didn't want to bring her husband Makoto back to Scotland was because she didn't want to suffer watching him become 'the little Chinaman.' You really think those Glasgow boys know or care about whether the guy they're kicking the crap out of is from Pakistan, India, Afghanistan or Iran? I've never felt physically threatened here, and while one person's experience doesn't count for a great deal, I'm not aware of many violent hate crimes against foreigners being discussed in the media either. Yes, there is racism here, but it seems pretty damned mild from where I'm standing.

5/12/05 00:12  
Blogger Jax said...

Maethelwine -Several points agreed with, as I said I haven't read as much of the diatribe as you I just read your blog - I have a 2 year old to kowtow to- but the last paragraph needs a reply. At no point did I suggest that racism or discrimintaion was worse here than anywhere else, far less in Scotland or Glasgow. The only comparison, and although cultural generalisatins are admittedly dodgy, to the extent that I mean it I stick by it (haha), was intended to mean that culturally "we" - and I did say in my experience, I will not comment on the greatness of your nation on this occasion - tend more to assign personal blame to the individual who commits the crime, than assume a propensity to commit such a crime to all members of whatever group that person may belong to. And I didn't just mean on racial issues in fact I meant Japanese on Japanese in general. Needless to say it'S 1am and I can't think of a good example but there are lots dammit.
Anyway, the point was in fact completely the opposite to what you seem to have assumed. Perhaps its only tone of type misunderstandings, but I am not assuming any national moral high ground and I haven't been here so long I've forgotten anything . I was talking about Japan. If I decided to go on about the injustices I perceive in Scotland that would be a whole nother blog. It's not a contest. Whether it's worse, better, different in the UK, is nor relevant to whether this will have a backlash here or not. Incidentally the " shut up and go home" comment was not intened to be aimed at you either.
And, as a parting shot, I wouldn't say racism has to involve violence to be devastating. (I'm sure you wouldn't either!)

5/12/05 00:58  
Blogger Jax said...

And another thing.... I don't think I want to publish my profile. I seldom write anything of any consequence, and besides , I'm shy.

5/12/05 01:00  
Blogger Jax said...

JJ- thanks. Your "but" seems to suggest that we disagree on a lot of parenting issues. I don't know if that's necessarily true, I meant to imply that there are definitely lots of others who disagree with both of us - can you imagine , and everyone is inadvertently offensive to some one at some point. You still have to stick by your convictions, and I respect people who put their money where their mouths are and do something, rather than just wish they had after.

5/12/05 11:27  
Blogger Jax said...

Maethelwine- and as to the evidence thing, I'm not suggesting they should give away important case blowing evidence on tv, whether about gaij or Japanese, I was commenting that I perceived a difference in what I saw, between the amount of minute detail that we DO usually get when it is a Japanese crime with a Japanese criminal and with this case. Again with hindsight, we may assume that they just didn't have any details yet, or ironcally, were perhaps trying to be more sensitive than usual because it was a foreigner, but you usually get to know what teh suspect had for breakfast 3 days ago and how that relates to the crime.

5/12/05 11:34  

Post a Comment

<< Home